Andrea Tantaros says she"s spent an ext than a million dollars and also has obtained nowhere in arbitration. She"s currently seizing ~ above a #metoo law enacted last year by brand-new York lawmakers.

You are watching: Andrea tantaros what is she doing now


Andrea Tantaros, previous co-host that Fox News’ The Five, has done just about everything to carry her battle with Fox News right into open court. On Monday, she test something new and fine worth watching: She’s seizing upon a law enacted last year by brand-new York lawmakers thatostensibly preventssexual harassment cases from gift arbitrated.

In April 2018, Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the regulation —Section 7515 of the Civil practice Law and also Rules — into effect. The movewas hugely influenced by Gretchen Carlson’s lawsuit against Fox News’ i get it Ailes, which prior to being settled, elevated the possibility that she’d be compelled into arbitration. The #MeToo motion sparked comparable anti-arbitration statutes about the nation, yet those have gone mainly untested for this reason far.

Tantaros alleges that she was subjected to demeaning comments around her human body from Ailes, provided a “graveyard” on-air time slot as soon as she rebuffed his advances, and also experienced sexual harassment from former Fox News organize Bill O’Reilly. In February 2017, a brand-new York judge threw her lawsuit come arbitration, an event that was overshadowed as soon as her attorney at the moment blabbed in open court around a federal investigation of exactly how Fox had handled sexual harassment claims against Ailes. She subsequently attempted a racketeering suit against Fox for surveilling and also stalking her, yet that was unsuccessful, too.

Now, Tantaros is back in court.

She’s search to prevent arbitration through a petition (see here) in brand-new York state court.

“Section 7515 is come mandatory arbitration of sexual harassment allegations or insurance claims what Brown v. Plank of Educationwas to racial discrimination,” writes she lawyer. “Section 7515 recognizes that female employees space no an ext equal in resources and bargaining strength in arbitrating sexual harassment claims versus their job than different black institutions were same to separate white schools throughout Jim Crow. There must be a level play field.”

Tantaros says the 3-year-old arbitration has compelled her to spend over seven numbers after gift professionally sidelined.

“There is quiet no light at the end of the tunnel for Ms. Tantaros,” continues the petition stuffed with literary allusions. “Without explanation, the Panel has refused to enable even the scheduling of depositions. They have actually not ordered the next to set a stipulated schedule because that hearings. The Panel has actually frozen the action in time like a petrified forest, do Charles Dickens’ infamous Jarndyce v. Jarndyce in Bleak House it seems to be ~ speedy in comparison. Meanwhile, Petitioner is experiencing irreparable injury to her career, reputation, and finances together Fox pursues her v the relentlessness that Captain Ahab and with money come burn. No wonder brand-new York passed CPLR section 7515….”

Section 7515 provides “null and void” any contract provision that calls for “mandatory arbitration to resolve any allegation or case of an unlawful discriminatory practice of sexual harassment.”

But, and this is a very big but, it’s questionable whether state lawmakers achieved much the anything.

That’s since Section 7515, along with other state statutes, might take a backseat come the commonwealth Arbitration Act. Indeed, top top June 26 in what shows up to be the an initial decision top top this topic, a brand-new York commonwealth judge ruled the 7515 was preemptedwhen assessing a discrimination and also harassment suit versus Morgan Stanley. “The FAA’s plan favoring the enforcement of arbitration agreements is not conveniently displaced through state law,” created the judge.

This is just one solitary decision, so Tantaros has actually hope the courts might agree with her the lawmakers merely codified the proposition that arbitration provisions in contracts are unconscionable because that victims.

Ultimately, the controversy over whether states have the right to impede sex-related harassment arbitration may be tackled at the appellate level (that is, if congress doesn’t amend the FAA first).

See more: Are You Supposed To Shake A Polaroid Picture Mean? Do You Really Need To Shake A Polaroid

Last October, the U.S. Can be fried Court decided in Lamps Plusto force an arbitration agreement against an employee who hoped to command a class action against his employer end a data breach. Composing for the four liberal justices in dissent, Ruth Bader Ginsburg explicitly nodded to section 7515 together ameliorating few of the injury from the decision. “ome States have endeavored come safeguard employees’ opportunities to carry sexual harassment suits in court,” she wrote. “These advances are sanguine, for ‘

lainly, it would certainly not comport through the congressional goals behind a state seeking come enforce civil rights…to permit the really forces that had actually practiced discrimination to contract away the best to enforce civil rights in the courts.”

As the ingredient of the can be fried Court currently stands, the opinion may not have the ability to attract a majority. It’d most likely be ironic if section 7515, born out of the roger Ailes affair, at some point falls top top the urging of Fox News.

A statement native Fox News reads, “Due come pending litigation, we will reserve our comment for the court system, v which we will certainly fight this baseless petition.”