brand-new Zealand element Minister Jacinda Ardern speak to media to address the Christchurch fixed shootings. Note Tantrum/Getty photos
After simply one fixed shooting, brand-new Zealand’s parliament on Wednesday poll 119-1 come ban most semiautomatic weapons and assault rifles in the country.

You are watching: Are guns banned in new new zealand

“New new zealand stands personal in that is widespread accessibility of weapons of such damaging nature and force,” prime Minister Jacinda Ardern told conference on Wednesday, follow to the Guardian. “Today that anomaly ends.”

The bill currently only requirements royal assent native the governor general — mostly a formality — to become law. With it, brand-new Zealand will ban the bulk of attack rifles and also semiautomatic weapons. The measure also includes a buyback program, with which brand-new Zealanders will have the ability to get rid the the now-outlawed weapons. Parts of the proposal are similar to the activity Australia took after its worst massive shooting, in 1996 — alters that have been connected to fewer gun deaths in the succeeding years.

The swift action comes after last month’s massive shootings at employee in Christchurch, new Zealand, in i beg your pardon a white supremacist killed 50 people.

New Zealand currently had much stronger gun laws than the us (as is true for arisen nations in general). For one, it requires a license to buy and own weapons — a conventional that just a couple of states in America have. However there are still gaps that have led to some doubters describing the country’s regulations as “patchy,” particularly when it involves the registration and also regulation of military-style semiautomatic rifles (often known as assault weapons).

Ardern previously promised additional changes, explicate the present measure as the “first tranche” of revolutionary to brand-new Zealand’s gun laws. Further transforms will address, amongst other issues, gaps in the country gun it is registered laws.

Americans who are used to their government reacting come mass shootings with no much more than “thoughts and prayers” may be surprised by brand-new Zealand’s swift reaction. Yet the power of the pistol lobby in the US, particularly the national Rifle Association, is a distinctly American factor that makes readjust much more daunting here. And brand-new Zealand’s fast transforms are also feasible because its parliamentary mechanism makes the much much easier for the judgment coalition to turn principles into truth quickly.

The result: it took just one mass shooting for brand-new Zealand to relocate to change its gun laws. In the US, wherein levels of pistol violence are usually much higher, that unclear if any type of changes will ever happen at the commonwealth level — even as the us suffers mass shooting after mass shoot on a virtually daily basis.

How brand-new Zealand’s gun laws are changing

Before any kind of changes, new Zealand’s gun laws were currently far more restrictive than America’s. As the US’s law Library of congress explained, new Zealand’s system mainly focuses on licensing, however registration of firearms is not constantly required.

New new zealand has reasonably high level of gun ownership: more than 1.2 million civilian-owned guns — around one gun for every 4 people, according to small Arms Survey, which provides approximates for pistol ownership roughly the world. The puts the country in the height 20 nations in the human being for civilian total ownership, though still far behind the US, which has much more than one gun for every person.

In brand-new Zealand, people very first have to attain a license to legally purchase, own, and possess a gun. A license applicant is vetted to check for a criminal record, a background of violence, drug and alcohol use, and relationships with possibly dangerous people, among other factors. The applicant likewise must go with a weapons safety course. That all generally takes months to acquire through.

Once a person makes it through the process, he’s permitted to purchase guns and ammo — although some varieties of firearms, favor handguns and certain semiautomatic rifles, call for “endorsements” from police and separate permits to purchase. Over there are also extra storage and also inspection requirements.

The licenses have to be put in order every 10 years, and police can revoke a person’s license if that human is believed to no longer be fit because that ownership and may pose a threat.

Gun sellers are additionally licensed and also regulated through police.

Unlike other licensing systems (such together Massachusetts’s), weapons in brand-new Zealand don’t always have to it is in registered. This can lead to bizarre circumstances in i m sorry a pistol only needs to be contempt modified come no much longer require registration. Because that example, attack weapons only need a slight alteration — favor being equipped v a lower-capacity newspaper — to fall under a much less restrictive classification that doesn’t call for registration, letting some possibly really deadly weapons fall through the cracks.

Despite the gaps, new Zealand’s gun legislations hadn’t gone through significant changes since a mass shooting resulted in reforms in 1992. Amendments happen in 2012 walk clarify some of the rules roughly registered assault weapons, but the changes were largely technical and minor.

So the reforms approved by new Zealand’s Parliament will certainly act together the most sweeping transforms to the country’s gun legislations in decades, closeup of the door the loopholes on the registration of assault rifles through banning the weapons entirely and also confiscating the weapons v a buyback scheme. Future reforms, Ardern said, will certainly also attend to other issues, favor gun registration.

Even there is no the changes, new Zealand’s gun legislations were already much stricter than the US’s. While new Zealand needs a license, which requires a months-long vetting process, for every gun owners, the united state doesn’t necessarily require also a simple background check, due to the fact that the commonwealth background check law has actually so countless loopholes that there are methods to get around it.

America’s weaker gun laws — the weakest in the occurred world — room one factor the US has much higher levels of gun violence than other countries. Number of studies have uncovered that stricter gun legislations are connected with fewer gun deaths, with several of the strongest study linking gun license schemes similar to new Zealand’s to far-reaching reductions in total deaths in Connecticut and also Missouri. One breakthrough evaluation concluded the the us doesn’t have more crime, generally, than other occurred countries, however it does have much more lethal crime, like murder — in big part because of easy accessibility to firearms.

New Zealand, because that its part, typically has few gun homicides. According to GunPolicy.org, the entire country had just eight gun homicides in every one of 2015, a rate of 0.18 firearm homicides per 100,000 people. In comparison, the us had virtually 13,000 total homicides that year — a rate of 4.04 per 100,000.

The Christchurch mosque shootings include up to 6 years’ precious of pistol homicides in new Zealand — a testimony to just how awful the attacks were, but additionally to exactly how rare such events are in the country. And the country’s leader are now taking measures to make certain such tragedies remain rare.

The NRA makes comparable action very unlikely in the US

The swift reaction come a mass shooting in new Zealand seems extremely unlikely in the US, which hasn’t passed any far-reaching changes to commonwealth gun laws since the 1990s.

That’s not due to the fact that stricter gun policies are unpopular. According to Pew Research facility surveys, most people in the US support universal lift checks, a commonwealth database to track gun sales, bans ~ above assault-style weapons, and also bans top top high-capacity magazines.

Instead, the difficulty lies in two related issues: those widely known as the intensity gap and also the NRA’s powerful presence in united state politics.

Historically, total owners and gun legal rights activists have simply to be much more activated through gun-related problems than supporters of stricter firearm laws. As Republican strategist Grover Norquist stated in 2000, “The question is intensity matches preference. You can always get a specific percentage to say they room in favor of part gun controls. However are lock going to vote on your ‘control’ position?” probably not, Norquist suggested, “but for the 4-5 percent who care about guns, they will certainly vote top top this.”

This is further enhanced by the NRA, the solitary most an effective organization in the US’s total debate. V a direct attach to numerous members, the NRA have the right to rally American gun owner to contact members that Congress and protest versus any proposal to restrict guns. The messaging tends to emphasis on the possibility that any type of restriction spread by conference is constantly one action toward legislations that end gun civil liberties altogether — a typical slippery slope argument. The riles increase the decimal of really passionate gun civil liberties supporters.

See more: Noncitizens Are Illegals Allowed To Vote In California, Fact Check: Non

As a result, conservative media and also politicians take it the NRA’s support — particularly the coveted A-to-F ratings the organization provides out — an extremely seriously. Politicians will walk to occasionally absurd length to display their support for gun rights. In 2015, because that example, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) starred in a video, from IJ Review, in which that cooked bacon with — this is no a joke — a device gun.