On Monday morning, the United says Supreme Court refuse to listen a case from California that allowed a public school to half American flag apparel worn through students.

You are watching: Are schools not allowed to fly the american flag

Without comment, the Court denied the case of Dariano v. Morgan Hills school District. In ~ least four of the ripe Justices were needed to obtain the case before the Court following year for arguments.

The move seemingly upholds a criterion set in the so late 1960s in the Tinker decision that institution officials have the right to censor college student passive complimentary speech if they feel the decided disrupts institution activities.

On Friday, the judge met in private to think about the case, which referrals several prominent an initial Amendment issues and reflects on the transforming demographics in 21st Century America.

The conflict goes back to a might 2009 incident between two groups of students in ~ Live Oak High School. At a school-sponsored Cinco de mei event, a Mexican-American college student walked roughly campus with the flag of Mexico and other students flew a makeshift United states flag in an answer and chanted at the flag-bearing student. Students on both sides complained about the incident.

A year later, several students came to school ~ above Cinco de mayo wearing American flag shirts and school officials told the college student to remove the American flag shirts, or turn the shirts within out. The educators stated the American flag shirts could send a blog post that would certainly offend the Cinco de mei celebrants and also they had actually public safety and security concerns.

The parental of the American flag-wearing students sue on your behalf, alleging very first Amendment violations by the Morgan Hill college District.

The federal ninth Circuit Court rule in favor of Morgan Hill school District. The lower courts claimed that the educators' American flag apparel ban didn’t hurt a standard collection in the well known Tinker case.

In the Tinker v. Des Moines case of 1969, the supreme Court said that student “don’t burned their constitutional civil liberties to flexibility of decided or expression in ~ the schoolhouse gate.” The Court likewise said in Tinker that educators have the right to take censorship activity against students if “students’ activities would materially and also substantially disrupt the work and also discipline the the school.”

In this new case, the lawyers because that the students case the ninth Circuit is do the efforts to adjust this definition, through restricting passive an initial Amendment speech. And also in fact, the student’s attorneys to speak the Court need to make that clear the American flag screens of any type shouldn’t it is in banned at public schools.

“There is never ever a legit basis because that banning the screen of one American flag on an American public college campus. And by incentivizing and lucrative violence together a legitimate solution to unpopular speech, the 9th Circuit’s decision is contradictory to our foundational very first Amendment principles and provides a dangerous great in civics come our public school students,” lock claim.

Morgan Hill’s lawyers to speak the teachers made the correct decisions based upon the rule created in the Tinker case.

“School public official on the scene had actually ample reason to think violence and also disruption were about to happen. Institution officials across the nation act against a backdrop of the should prevent an additional Santee, Columbine, Littleton, or any of the thousands of school shootings that have happened since Tinker was decided,” the Morgan Hill lawyers argue.

They likewise believe the instance isn’t a referendum on flying the American flag in ~ public schools.

See more: Alert Me When Stock Reaches Certain Price, Stock Alerts Background

“This categorical explain misstates the nature the this case, and also misreads the Constitutional issues involved,” the Morgan Hill lawyers argue. “According come Petitioners, the plain deference paid to institution regulation of student dress and expression have to disappear anytime the flag is involved – even, here, as soon as there is no flag involved, however clothing with a flag ’theme.’ over there is no constitution basis because that such a distinction, specifically in the context of security at schools.”

Two human being who additionally wanted the case decided by the supreme Court are Mary Beth and John Tinker, the petitioners in the 1969 cost-free speech case.

“It is ironic the the student expression censured in this case associated a showing of respect for the American flag,” the Tinkers stated in their court brief. They fear that a judgment in favor of the school would send “a message that is the really antithesis of the first Amendment: that speech have the right to be successfully suppressed by hazard of violence.”