Disclosure statement

The authors carry out not work-related for, consult, very own shares in or receive capital from any agency or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no pertinent affiliations beyond their scholastic appointment.

You are watching: Are there term limits for supreme court justices

Partners

*

justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Brooks Kraft LLC/Corbis via Getty images

And they do. Justice Clarence thomas was appointed by president George H.W. Bush at age 43 in 1991 and famously stated he would serve for 43 years. There’s one more 13 years until his promise is met.

The court’s newest member, Donald Trump’s nominee Amy Coney Barrett, to be 48 when she took she seat in so late 2020 ~ the death of 87-year-old justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Ginsburg, a Clinton appointee that joined the court at period 60 in 1993, refused to retire. When liberals pressed she to step down during the presidency that Democrat Barack Obama come ensure a like-minded replacement, she protested: “So tell me who the president could have nominated this spring the you would fairly see top top the court 보다 me?”

Partisanship problems

Justices change during their years on the bench, study shows.

Justices who at the time of their confirmation espoused views that reflected the basic public, the Senate and the president who appointed them have tendency to move away from those choices over time. They become an ext ideological, concentrated on putting their own policy preferences right into law. For example, Ginsburg grew much more liberal over time, while Thomas has actually become much more conservative.

Other Americans’ political preferences tend come be steady throughout your lives.

The consequence is that supreme Court justices may no much longer reflect the America they preside over. This can be problematic. If the court to be to frequently stray too far from the public’s values, the public could reject that is dictates. The can be fried Court depends on public confidence to keep its legitimacy.

Life tenure has also turned staffing the supreme Court right into an increasingly partisan process, politicizing among the nation’s most an effective institutions.

In the 1980s and also 1990s, can be fried Court nominees can generally suppose large, bipartisan assistance in the Senate. Today, judicial confirmation votes are nearly strictly under party lines. Public support for judicial nominees likewise shows large differences between Democrats and Republicans.

Life tenure have the right to turn supposedly elevation judges right into political players who attempt to time their departures to secure their wanted successors, as Justice Anthony Kennedy go in 2018. Trump card appointed Brett Kavanaugh, one of Kennedy’s former clerks, to change him.


*

justice Anthony Kennedy receiving the 2019 Liberty Medal native Justice Neil Gorsuch. William cutting board Cain/Getty images

The propose solution

Many can be fried Court specialists have coalesced roughly a equipment to this problems: staggered, 18-year terms v a vacancy automatically developing every two years in nonelection years.

This mechanism would promote judicial legitimacy, they argue, by taking leave decisions the end of the justices’ hands. The would aid insulate the court from coming to be a campaign issue since vacancies would certainly no longer arise during election years. And also it would maintain judicial self-reliance by shielding the court from politics calls to fundamentally transform the institution.

Partisanship would certainly still tinge the an option and check of judges by the president and also Senate, however, and also ideological extremists might still with the can be fried Court. However they would be limited to 18-year terms.

The U.S. Can be fried Court is among the world’s few high court to have life tenure. Virtually all autonomous nations have either solved terms or mandatory retirement periods for their optimal judges. Foreign courts have encountered few problems with term limits.

Even England – the country on i beg your pardon the U.S. Model is based – no much longer grants its supreme Court justices life tenure. They have to now retire at 70.

Similarly, although many U.S. States initially granted their supreme court judges life tenure, this changed during the Jacksonian era of the 1810s to 1840s when states search to boost the accountability the the judicial branch. Today, just supreme court judges in Rhode Island have life tenure. All various other states either have actually mandatory retirement eras or let voters select when judges leaving the bench through judicial elections.


*

ago in 1894, the supreme Court to be older – not to cite whiter and also all male. C.M. Bell/Library the Congress/Corbis/VCG via Getty images

Polling consistently mirrors a large bipartisan bulk of american support ending life tenure. This most likely reflects eroding public confidence together the court routinely problems decisions down partisan present on the day’s many controversial issues. Back ideology has actually long influenced Supreme Court decisions, today’s court is unusual because all the conservative justices room Republicans and all the free justices space Democrats.

In April 2021, president Biden formed a committee to research reforming the can be fried Court, consisting of term-limiting justices. To end the justices’ life tenure would most likely mean a constitutional amendment requiring approval from two-thirds that both dwellings of Congress and also three-fourths the U.S. States.

Ultimately, Congress, the states and the windy they stand for will decide whether the country’s centuries-old life time tenure system still serves the needs of the American people.

See more: Articles On The Right To Bear Arms Gets Its Day In Court, The True Meaning Of ‘Keep And Bear Arms’

<The Conversation’s politics + society editors pick need-to-know stories. authorize up for national politics Weekly.>