army tanks and soldiers line up in Tiananmen Square during a armed forces parade to note the 19th ... <+> anniversary that the regime.

You are watching: Are we going to war with china 2021

Bettmann save on computer

The Pentagon undoubtedly draws up various scenarios for how conflict in between China and also the U.S. Can develop. Most of them would certainly involve a Chinese move against Taiwan. Yet Taiwan and also China have actually co-existed in intense yet bloodless antagonism for seven decades without tipping into real war.The critical question is: What would create an really Chinese armed forces adventure?

I deserve to answer the question.

to step ago – If over there is to be a war, an open war, v China – and also we may stipulate the this scenario is in ~ the far end of the spectrum of possibilities, and yet no an impossibility–if over there is to it is in a war, it will certainly not to happen from west outrage at human rights hurt in Xinjiang, or Chinese angry at western outrage, or cyber-crime, or an innovation theft, or money manipulation, or protection crackdowns in Hong Kong, or indignities visited upon the Filipinos or the Vietnamese or the Australians.

It will arise indigenous acute financial pain, inflicted on China by action of the United states to deprive lock of the most vital physical source of the 21st century: semiconductors.

A new type of 300 millimeter wafer with semiconductor chips and also finished microchips the the ... <+> semiconductor. (Photo by JENS SCHLUETER / AFP) (Photo by JENS SCHLUETER/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty photos
MORE because that YOU

Stocks This Week: buy KLA Tencor and also Starbucks

Fintech Stocks continue To Lag The Market. Time to Buy?

What’s following For BlackBerry stock After A 4% relocate Last Week?

The semiconductor problem, and the boosting vulnerability that China’s economic climate – and its armed forces – to supply constraints, is what will certainly lead China come consider, finally, fully military activity against Taiwan.

In fact, over there is a solid historical parallel: China in 2021 find itself in a situation an extremely much like the case of Japan in 1941.

The Japanese Precedent

that pretty clear the Japanese military aggression in 1941 was driven by the should secure the country’s oil supply.

“A recently uncovered diary from among Emperor Hirohito’s aides provides clear exactly how the Japanese viewed oil’s importance in the Pacific war. It price quotes the late emperor as saying, after ~ the war, the Japan went to war with the united States since of oil — and also lost the war since of oil.” “The Japanese armed forces was obsessed with oil.The Japanese military device was practically entirely dependent ~ above imported oil — and that intended the unified States, i m sorry supplied around 80 percent the Japan’s usage in those days. ‘If there were no it is provided of oil,’ one admiral said, ‘battleships would be nothing more than scarecrows.’”

Japan seek to address its vulnerability by investing in brand-new technology. However it was unsuccessful, as detailed in a peer-reviewed write-up entitled “Synthetic fuel manufacturing in prewar and World battle II Japan: A situation study in technical failure,” published in 1993 in the newspaper Annals the Science.

“To accomplish independence in petroleum, the Japanese establish a synthetic fuel sector for the switch of coal to oil. Actually, the Japanese had started research on synthetic fuel in the 1920s, just a few years after other countries, such as Germany and also Britain, that lacked resources of organic petroleum. Lock did fantastic laboratory research study on the charcoal hydrogenation and also Fischer-Tropsch switch processes, but in your haste come construct large synthetic fuel plants they bypassed the intermediated pilot-plant stage and also failed to make a successful shift from small- to large production.”

Japan’s just other “solution” connected military expansionism. After the fall of France in 1940, Japan moved to occupy French Indochina, as a steppingstone come oil producing regions in Malaysia and the Dutch east Indies.

This led the U.S. To retaliate economically, in June 1941.

“Roosevelt froze every Japanese heritage in America. Britain and the Dutch eastern Indies complied with suit. The result: Japan lost access to 88 percent the its imported oil. Japan’s oil reserves to be only adequate to last 3 years, and only half that time if it saw war.”

indigenous that point on, the sequence leading to Pearl harbor was essentially deterministic, provided the objectives and also psychologies the the next involved.

In short – Japan in 1941 uncovered itself in a place of acute strategic vulnerability, intolerable in irradiate of its political geography ambitions.

China’s Semiconductor Crisis

Today, China’s tech economic situation runs ~ above silicon – the is, semiconductors.

To accomplish this substantial appetite because that silicon, China buys 60% of the world chip production. 90% of that is sourced from outside China or developed domestically by foreign manufacturers (e.g., Intel INTC ). In short, China is extremely dependent on a resource that that does no control.

This trouble (from the Chinese perspective) is vast and growing. China’s position in the an international industry is small and stunted. The U.S account for almost 50% market share that the global industry, and also has kept this leading position for three decades. China is grounding at around 5% – and also is no really a player external its captive Chinese market.

global Semiconductor market Market re-publishing by country 2018-2019

graph by author

more important is the qualitative gap. The high-value component of the semiconductor market is the “fabless” IC sector, the providers that regulate the design of the chips that power the digital economy.Fabless companies drive the cycles of creation which lead the more comprehensive economy.

China is not a player at every in the fabless segment. 9 of the optimal 13 fabless IC football player (those with more than $1 billion in revenue) room U.S.-based. There is not a single Chinese company in this group.

In the foundry sector, the various other “half” of the sector where the physical manufacturing of integrated circuits is carried out, China has actually struggled for years to gain a foothold. China’s fabrication capabilities space meager, and also are four to five an innovation generations behind the leaders. China’s “champion” in this room — Semiconductor Manufacturing international Corp. (SMIC) – has announced a setup to build a new IC fabrication facility (in partnership through the city the Shanghai) to produce incorporated circuits making use of 28-nanometer technology. This is around ten year behind the Taiwanese foundry, TSMC, i beg your pardon is scheduled to lug out 3-nanometer chips next year. (Samsung already manufactures another version of 3-nanometer IC’s.) Indeed, Taiwan dominates the foundry company – v 63% of the market, 10 times the dimension of China’s position. (Keep that crucial fact in mind.)

SMIC compared to Industry finest IC Fabrication Standards

graph by writer

In short, China is not investing in semiconductor an innovation at almost everywhere near the level of the U.S. Or Europe, one of two people in quantitative or qualitative terms. Together a portion of sales, the american invest double as much as the Chinese suppliers do. In absolute dollar terms, the U.S. Invested about 18 times more than China (2018).

R&D invest by the Semiconductor industry in the US and China, 2018

graph by author

The three market leaders in IC production –TSMC, Samsung, and Intel –have announced plans come invest end $300 Billion in the next ten years. It is a large number even for Beijing. (Despite its federal government support, SMIC has not to be able come commit the complete amount the the $8.8 billion its 28-nm foundry will certainly require. They’ll still it is in looking come raise billions from external investors.)

These are all symptom of China’s structural inability to contend in this industry, to resolve the semiconductor trouble organically, through inner development. V such a substantial investment deficit, that is virtually specific that the technology gap will widen. China will certainly likely fall further behind.

Government activity Isn’t The Answer

Why can’t the Chinese federal government solve this through direct public invest — a moon-shot approach, the kind of thing that authoritarian energy supposedly excel at?

castle have certainly tried. Semiconductor independence has been the explicit focus ofChinese federal government industrial policy for decades. New initiatives have repeatedly to be announced, with grandiose, soviet-style bravado –in 2014, for example, Beijing set “a score of establishing a world-leading semiconductor sector in all locations of the integrated circuit it is provided chain by 2030.”

The track record has actually not to be encouraging. In one more column, we’ll evaluation the history of this efforts much more closely. For now, BusinessWeek summarizes the issue succinctly:

“China’s background with chipmaking, which started an ext than 20 years ago, has been marked by unfulfilled promises, stillborn projects, and government waste. And also though government initiatives have helped create some huge companies, China hasn’t created a solitary chipmaker top top the world-beating range of the significant rivals outside its borders…. China has failed to store pace.”

commercial policy, federal government funded and also directed, simply may not occupational here. An industry experienced quoted in BusinessWeek put it this way:

“The semiconductor market is really market-oriented. It isn’t favor launching a room station. In the chip sector there’s a lot to consider, from expense to efficiency. These determinants are complicated to placed in government policies.”

American financial “Aggression”

The last couple of years have added brand-new pressure, together the U.S. Has gradually choked turn off the IC pipeline. American plans directed against unfair trade, an innovation theft, nationwide security risks, and facility by geopolitical rivalries and diplomatic conflicts, have tightened the noose. For example, Huawei –China’s champion in the telecommunications ar – has been crippled through the denial of accessibility to American semiconductors.

The net-net: like Japan in 1941, China currently finds itself in a position of acute strategy vulnerability, intolerable in light of its geopolitical ambitions.

The war Scenario

The potential pathway to problem is straightforward. It deserve to be explained abstractly:

The economic climate of country A is vitally dependence on X. Country B controls the supply of X. Country A tries yet is not able to build an independent supply of X. Nation B embargoes shipments of X to nation A. Country C – i beg your pardon is close at your disposal to country A– is a great source that X. Country A invades nation C. Country B comes to the defense of nation C, and also finds chin at battle with nation A.

The parallels in between the Japanese situation in 1941 and the Chinese situation today are striking.

The historic Parallels - 1941 & 2021

chart by author

Tipping in the direction of Taiwan

there are plenty of reasons China can wish to move on Taiwan, and finally, ~ 70 years, to be done through it. However until now, clearly none of those reasons have been saturated compelling to hazard the possibility of open conflict with the U.S.

The semiconductor situation outlined below could change that. Beijing might come to see how a take over of Taiwan would resolve this worsening strategic vulnerability every at once. Indeed, offered the leading bottleneck-status of TSMC in the global eco-system the semiconductors (as defined in a ahead column), a Taiwan takeover could turn the tables top top the West, and also enhance China’s geopolitical position past alleviating the it is provided shortage.

War speak –Just Talk?

room we complacent? Media explanation of the political and also economic tension between the U.S. And China frequently favor armed forces metaphors –“trade wars,”“wolf warriors” –attacks, assaults, attrition, technical “arms races” etc.– every one of which lug a certain energy and also flair come stories extending what are often rather dried bureaucratic disagreements (over tariff policies, money exchange rates, audit standards). The push coverage deserve to sound over-excited, the “threats” are frequently exaggerated – but eventually the news is consumed v the morning coffee, digested, and discounted back to normalcy. We are provided to it. Fear headlines sell newspapers.

Is over there a risk that an allegory could morph into Reality? Is open military conflict unthinkable?

the is simple to assume the we are all as well grown-up come let mere trade problems get the end of hand. Or we may assume that “globalization” and also economic interconnectedness – “interlocking interests”– will defuse any real opportunity of war. Maybe so. Ns myself make these assumptions. It help me come sleep much more easily.

However, over there is history to consider, in the kind of the Angell thesis. Norman Angell (1872-1967) to be “an English Nobel tranquility Prize winner, a lecturer, journalist, author and Member that Parliament.” he led a fascinating life, however is remembered this day for his book, published in 1909 and titled v unintended irony, The an excellent Illusion. Angell’s premise was that due to the fact that of what we would certainly now speak to globalization, battle in Europe had come to be economically impossible –

“Angell’s major thesis was the ‘the economic cost of battle was so good that no one can possibly expect to obtain by starting a war the aftermath of which would certainly be for this reason disastrous.’ war was economically and also socially irrational…the economic interdependence between industrial countries would be ‘the actual guarantor the the good behavior the one state come another.’” - Wikipedia

the course, the sequel no play the end that way in 1914, or in 1941, and also it must be a caution to our complacency in 2021.


My first career: I invested 25 years in the high-tech segment of the wireless technology industry, affiliated in the early development and commercialization of digital wireless architectures (2G, 3G etc). Ns was the chairman that an engineering joint endeavor with the advanced development arm that the Israeli military, Rafael. I served as CEO and also Chairman that Illinois Superconductor Corporation, at the time a portfolio company of the investment firm Elliott Associates. I have actually been the audit committee chairman for several public companies, and also managed a wide selection of resources raising projects, consisting of public offerings, and also many private financings. I have performed technical and also commercial "due diligence" assessments ~ above a range of invest for numerous leading hedge funds and also private same firms.

See more: Alyssa Milano Guardians Of The Galaxy, James Gunn On Twitter


My second career: In 2003, i joined Stevens institute of Technology, whereby I created and also oversee a variety of programs in Quantitative Finance and also related fields. Ns am the executive Director of the Hanlon Financial systems Research center at Stevens. Ns am additionally the co-Principal Investigator for a newly awarded planning approve from the nationwide Science foundation to create an Industry/University participating Research facility focused on financial sciences and also technologies. I am the author of several books on wireless technology, and also my new book is Price & Value: A overview to Equity market Valuation Metrics, published this year through Springer/Apress.