I newly read around a research that prove the potential for enhanced spread of respiratory tract particles with neck gaiters. Have the right to you provide any insight into this study? should I be making use of a various mask or layering the gaiter in different ways to improve effectiveness, or is the too at an early stage to know for sure? 


You are not the only human with this question. All of a sudden, it seems prefer everyone is talking about neck gaiters.

You are watching: Best neck gaiter for covid 19

The quick answer is that various other mask choices are probably better than a single-layer neck gaiter in many situations, yet a gaiter, even at a solitary thickness, is nearly certainly better than nothing.

The longer answer — and the backstory of exactly how neck gaiters suddenly emerged as a topic of public discourse and also debate — has to do with that research you heard about. Yet even an ext so with the way it’s been reported in the media.

The story starts with fight it out University Chemistry Professor boy name Fischer answering a call from duke vxcialistoufjg.com school Professor Eric Westman for assist in comes up with a low-cost technique for analyzing the efficacy of challenge coverings. Fischer’s equipment was a simple but ingenious contraption involving a cardboard box, a laser, a darkened room, and also a cellphone. Fischer recruited his daughter, Emma, a duke student, to assist him check it — one speaking into the machine and the other using a cellphone camera to document the laser-lit plume of respiratory particles exit by each utterance. Climate Fischer supplied a basic computer algorithm to count the variety of particles exit in 15 different problems — very first with no obstacle between mouth and also box, then using one of 14 different face coverings.

This experiment is a great example the what’s frequently referred to together a “proof that principle” or “proof the concept.” This have the right to be defined as one initial demonstrate of a specific an approach or idea in stimulate to demonstrate its feasibility or valuable potential. In other words, the score of Fischer’s research was to discover out if his cheap, hacked-together an approach of examining face coverings would certainly work as well as much more elaborate and pricy experimental set-ups. In that regard, the study was a success. Fischer’s results to be predictable: an N95 mask perform best, complied with by a surgical mask, a cloth mask with a polypropylene filter, and then others. Since he obtained the exact same sort of outcomes that larger, more rigorous studies of mask efficacy had demonstrated, Fischer confirmed that that developed, in his words, “a measurement setup is inexpensive and can be built and also operated by non-experts, pervxcialistoufjg.comting for fast evaluation that mask performance during speech, sneezing, or coughing.”

But that’s not what the media took far from his paper. Rather, news reports focused on one anomalous an outcome — his single test that the neck gaiter, which developed slightly more, and smaller, respiratory droplets 보다 he’d measure in the baseline, no-mask condition. Fischer and also his colleagues, none of them aerosol scientists, speculated that maybe this details fabric somehow functioned to splice big respiratory droplets right into smaller ones. If true, this would, indeed, make a gaiter worse 보다 no mask at all.

But, based upon aerosol science, this is unlikely. Multiple exam of challenge coverings have presented that any face covering will block at least a tiny percentage that droplets generated when us speak or cough. When researchers have ranked the performance of various cloth face coverings, no previous study has ever identified any kind of face spanning that is less effective than no challenge covering at all. Fischer’s results on this solitary test the a single neck gaiter may be because of any number of variables for which this proof-of-concept examine did not control: to be he talking louder? walk the product of the neck gaiter retain moisture? Did the have an ext mucus on his vocal cords at that moment?

Even Fischer to express dismay at the media’s coverage the his work. “Our intent was no to to speak this mask doesn’t work, or never use neck gaiters,” that told the New York Times.

See more: Are Santa’S Reindeers Male Or Female, Santa'S Sleigh Is Pulled By Female Reindeer

“This was not the main part of the paper.”

Research ~ above the efficiency of gaiters and also other challenge coverings is most likely to continue. Already Jin Pan, a Virginia tech graduate student who studies organic particles, is report on his preliminary testing of two varieties of gaiters — a single-layer gaiter do of 100 percent polyester and also a two-layer gaiter, made v 87 percent polyester and 13 percent spandex. Pan and his colleagues supplied mask-testing protocols developed by the national Institute for job-related Safety and Health and also found the both gaiters were at least somewhat effective at blocking respiratory particles. Both clogged 100 percent of very large, 20-micron droplets and at the very least 50 percent that one-micron aerosols. When it involved smaller particles, the single-layer gaiter blocked only 10 percent of 0.5-micron particles, if the two-layer gaiter clogged 20 percent. However, as soon as the researchers doubled the single-layer gaiter, that blocked an ext than 90 percent of all particles measured.

Bottom line? Cover her face. Overall, research shows that 2 layers that anything are much better than one and that fit matters — no face covering will certainly be effective if it’s not snug on your face. As research study on mask performance continues, we’ll report on the results here. And also Fischer hopes his methodology will be part of that story going forward. As he called the New York Times, “Our will was for this technology to acquire out there so companies and organizations deserve to test their own masks. A mask doesn’t need to be perfect for it to work.”